Abstract.
We want to give a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra using methods from Complex Analysis, in particular Liouville’s Theorem.
As a warm-up, I want to give probably the most beautiful proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra which I know, using the theory of one complex variable. In case you don’t know the theorem:
Theorem (Fundamental Theorem of Algebra).Letbe a polynomial,
. If
, there exist constants
,
such that
![]()
The main ingredient of the proof is the following statement, which is in fact eqiuvalent to the Fundamental Theorem:
Lemma.Letbe a non-constant polynomial. Then there exists an
with
.
Proof.Assume that on the contrary,
is zero-free. In that case,
defines a entire function, i.e. a function defined on
which is holomorphic everywhere. We will show that
is bounded, whence it follows by Liouville’s Theorem that
is constant. This implies that
is constant, a contradiction.
First, write
with
; then
Clearly, for
,
uniformly, whence
uniformly for
. Therefore,
is bounded on
for some
.
Now consider
on
. We have that
is continuous on
, and since
is compact, we know that
attains its maximum on
, whence
is bounded on
.
Therefore,
is bounded on
, and we can conclude.
□
Now we are able to prove the Fundamental Theorem:
Proof (Fundamental Theorem).We proceed by induction on
, the degree of
. If
, then
, whence we can set
and
.
Now assume that the statement holds for polynomials of degree
. Let
be a polynomial of degree
. By the lemma, there exists some
with
. Now, using the Division Algorithm, write
with polynomials
satisfying
, i.e.
. Now
whence we have
and, therefore,
. As
, we have
.
Therefore, by the induction hypothesis, there exist
,
with
, whence
i.e. the induction hypothesis holds for
, too.
□

be a polynomial,
. If
, there exist constants
,
such that
be a non-constant polynomial. Then there exists an
with
.
is zero-free. In that case,
defines a entire function, i.e. a function defined on
which is holomorphic everywhere. We will show that
is bounded, whence it follows by
with
; then
Clearly, for
,
uniformly, whence
uniformly for
for some
.
. We have that
, and since
attains its maximum on
, and we can conclude.
, the degree of
, then
, whence we can set
and
.
. Let
. By the
with
. Now, using the
with polynomials
satisfying
, i.e.
. Now
whence we have
and, therefore,
. As
, we have
.
, whence
i.e. the induction hypothesis holds for 
[...] to my research. the formulae will be rendered with latex; mathml is simply unuseable so far. an example post shows a feature with i added to my wp-latex enhancer plugin: (primitive) environments for [...]